| The contents of the order reprodued hereunder are by Courtesy of Web Site of Honourable Supreme Court of India Daily Orders page http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/wc%2055007p.txt
|
|
ITEM NO.4 & 50 COURT NO.7 SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 550 OF 2007 (FOR PREL. HEARING)
INDIAN OIL CORP.LTD.& ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)
WITH
Writ Petitions (C) Nos.573/2007 & 561/2007 (FOR PREL. HEARING)
(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)
AND Writ Petition (C) No.589/2007 (With appln. for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date: 12/10/2007 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY For Petitioner(s) in WP 550/07: Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr.Adv. Mr. V.N. Koura, Adv. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Ms. Paramjit Benepal, Adv. for M/s Arputham,Aruna & Co.,Advs. in WPs 573/07 & Mr. Dhruv Agarwal, Sr.Adv. 589/07: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. in WP 561/07: Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr.Adv. Mr. S.Ganesh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, Adv.
...2/-
-2-
For Respondent(s) -State: Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Shail Kr. Dwivedi, AAG. Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Adv. Mr. T.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. G. Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kr. Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Ms. Vandana Mishra, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER
We are of the view that in these cases, it would be open to the petitioners to move the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Ordnance No.35/2007 known as the U.P. Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Area Ordnance, 2007. The order of status quo dated 28th September, 2007 shall operate for one week only from today. The said order will come to an end on the expiry of one week from today. We make it clear that this order of status quo will be there only for one week from today. We do not wish to express any opinion on the merits or on the question as to whether the status quo order should continue or not on expiry of one week. Subject to above, Writ Petitions are dismissed.
(N. Annapurna) (Madhu Saxena) Court Master Court Master
|